Boycott nonsense | North Valley Notebook
 

Home > Blogs > North Valley Notebook > Archives > 2008 > January > 10 > Entry

Boycott nonsense

How will west Dayton cope with its Kroger gone?

And do you care?

The wealthier you are, the more options you have. You have the money, and the world will beat a path to your door.

The wealthier you are, the more respected and trustworthy you appear. Don’t believe me? Name a millionaire executed for murder.

Ever try to get a loan? If you are flush, the banks will loan you the money. Don’t have money (even if you are working two jobs) and no one is interested except those store-front places.

I understand the pound-of-flesh concept. These “loans” want half your body by the time the charges are totaled.

For many, it’s the only source of emergency cash.

Which is why the payday loans can charge such rates. This is not usury. Usury is illegally loaning money at unreasonably high rates.

What the kind loan folks do is legal. Which begs the question: How can that be?

Something, perhaps, our state legislators might wish to address. Or not.

A grocery store is not a payday loan. It’s the center of the community. It’s where you see nearly everyone. Even the rich have to eat.

So when the grocery chain announced it was closing its North Gettysburg store, the community was appalled.

It seemed — likely was — unfair.

Where else was a body going to get their food? Why should the community be denied a grocery store?

Because it wasn’t making sufficient profit to warrant keeping it open.

Free enterprise is a beast, red in fang and claw. It weeds out the weak, ill-conceived, ill-prepared or outdated ventures.

Urban grocery stores — an endangered species — are often accused of overcharging their patrons. The cost of food is often lower in the suburbs.

The cost of doing business also is often lower in the suburbs. My dad had a hardware store on the “nord side” of Minneapolis, while an uncle had one across the river in a somewhat tonier section of town.

I remember my dad replacing a front display window about once a year. The back door seemed to get kicked in about every third week. When he and I replaced it with a steel door, it lasted a couple months until someone repeatedly rammed it with a stolen truck.

Those costs started to add up.

My uncle replaced one display window in the dozen years he owned his store.

This had nothing to do with race, ethnicity, gender or religion. It had everything to do with wealth, education and despair. Dr. King taught us that.

Many in west Dayton are mad. They believe they should have convenient access to good and affordable food. They want a grocery store.

There is a tinge of irony here. When the store opened in 1987, community activists picketed, calling on the community to patronize other area grocers.

That didn’t work. Nor will boycotting Kroger now. Those days are gone.

Working together might.

Whether you care about west Dayton’s plight might depend on how much money you have in your wallet and how much hope you have in your heart.

Permalink | Comments (7) | Post your comment | Categories: Random musings

Comments

By tbill

January 23, 2008 8:56 AM | Link to this

What a load of crap. Does this guy get paid to write this? Speculation, musings, and falsehoods. Working together? A grocery store is the center of the community? Jeez. It’s all based on the amount of money you have? How many millionaires murder? A darned small percentage of the murderers are millionaires, and that’s a fact.

By Riverdale Ghost

January 16, 2008 5:20 PM | Link to this

Pardon me, J, but where are you coming from? A drug DEALER is out to sell drugs — logically they would be out to find new customers no matter how many old ones the police arrest…. And, neither the dealer nor the customers necessarily live in a given neighborhood. Ever hear of suburbanites arrested in the city for various not-so-nice things? It happens, chum.

By J

January 16, 2008 1:34 PM | Link to this

My take on the subject: The bad-eggs in the community brought this on themselves. I completely agree with Steve on not blaming free enterprise in this situation. Hey, if the cops were to wipe out all of the drug users in a particular neighborhood, would the drug dealers hang around trying to make a sale?? Hell no!! They would move out and onto greener pastures where they could turn a dime.

By doug page

January 11, 2008 3:04 PM | Link to this

Steve, Thanks for your thoughts. When I looked at the situation, two things struck me. First community activists were angry when the store closed. Almost as angry as they were in 1987 when they picketed the store’s opening. Second, why spin your wheels trying to change the result of market forces? Look how many payday loan joints are in your neighborhood. Look at the money they suck out of the neighborhood in fees, charges and interest. Wouldn’t your community be better served if you took on the paydays than bemoan the loss of a grocery store? And for Dave, the Oxford-American Dictionary’s take on usury: “the illegal action or practice of lending money at unreasonably high rates of interest”

By Dave

January 11, 2008 9:24 AM | Link to this

Get a dictionary and look up “usury”.

By Steve

January 11, 2008 6:31 AM | Link to this

Mr Page seems to be drifting in and out of the thought process. Is this blog about Payday loans companies or the closing of Krogers? To the closing of Krogers that wound was self inflicted by the community. A business is a business and it’s function is to turn a profit. To blame free enterprise for the demise of this store is absolutely crazy. I know that capitalism has it’s problems but the system works. Without going out on a limb and pointing fingers I’ll say that those who shopped at this Krogers and stole or witnessed stealing and didn’t report it YOU ARE THE ONES TO BLAME!!! This argument as ugly as it is, is why Krogers is closing. When more product walks out than is sold it is time to shut it down. We had a Dave’s market in Forrest Park for a long time but more stuff was being stollen than sold. It’s simple economics. Quit boo hooing Doug and instill some morals and ethics into the community instead of pointing fingers accept the blame. I will wait for your reply!

By Riverdale Ghost

January 10, 2008 10:34 PM | Link to this

Actually, it has to do with citizenship or the notion of living peacefully in a community (group) with others. Setting aside the debate about what profits are fair or honest profits for the moment; if, say, someone wants to stay in the same room with someone else, there is no disturbing of the peace. The place is shared and the other person respected. Trouble happens when that idea is forgotten. The mystery is, why the criminal element has a warped view of the inter-dependency of people, which criminal outlook, incidentally, is not limited to statutory definitions. A hardware store is a hardware store; but, was the merchandise identical?
Post a comment



Remember me?


Commenting on this blog is moderated. Your blog will wait in a queue for approval by an administrator.


*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.

 

Fairfield-Echo.com:

Copyright 2008 Fairfield-Echo. All rights reserved.

By using Fairfield-Echo.com, you accept the terms of our visitor agreement and privacy policy. You may wish to note our other business policies.

This website is ACAP-enabled